Cognitive Style

Overview

Cognitive style refers to the preferred way an individual processes information. Unlike individual differences in abilities (e.g., intelligence), cognitive style is not a cognitive ability but a preferred way of using such abilities (Kozhevnikov, 2007). Cognitive styles are often thought of as a cognitive "habit," and each person may be uniquely predisposed to think in a certain way. However, there is still much debate about how much of a role cognitive style plays in our cognition, and how much is flexible.

A close-up, high-resolution image of a human brain.

History

The concept of cognitive style has a rich history in psychology, dating back to the early 20th century when psychologists began to notice differences in the way people perceive and process information. The term was first coined by psychologist and educational researcher, Gordon Allport in 1937. Allport suggested that cognitive style could be a significant factor in understanding individual differences in learning and problem-solving.

Types of Cognitive Styles

There are several different types of cognitive styles that have been identified by researchers. These include, but are not limited to:

Field Dependence-Independence

Field dependence-independence is a cognitive style that describes the extent to which an individual's perception is affected by the surrounding context. Field-dependent individuals have a tendency to view the field as a whole, while field-independent individuals are more likely to separate the field into parts.

Holistic-Analytic

Holistic-analytic cognitive style refers to whether an individual tends to perceive a situation as a whole (holistic) or in terms of its individual parts (analytic).

Serialist-Holist

Serialist-holist cognitive style describes how an individual approaches problem-solving. Serialists tend to solve problems in a linear, step-by-step manner, while holists prefer to understand the problem as a whole before attempting to solve it.

A person deep in thought, looking at a complex problem on a whiteboard.

Measurement of Cognitive Styles

Cognitive styles can be measured using a variety of methods. Some of the most common methods include questionnaires, such as the Cognitive Styles Analysis (Riding, 1991), and performance-based tasks, such as the Group Embedded Figures Test (Witkin et al., 1971).

Implications of Cognitive Styles

Understanding an individual's cognitive style can have significant implications in a variety of areas, including education, career choice, and interpersonal communication.

Education

In education, understanding a student's cognitive style can help educators tailor their teaching methods to better suit the student's preferred way of learning. For example, a student with a holistic cognitive style may benefit from a teaching approach that presents the big picture first, before breaking down the material into smaller parts.

Career Choice

Cognitive style can also play a role in career choice. For example, individuals with an analytic cognitive style may be more likely to excel in careers that require detailed analysis, such as engineering or accounting, while those with a holistic cognitive style may be more suited to careers that require a broad overview, such as management or marketing.

Interpersonal Communication

In interpersonal communication, understanding another person's cognitive style can help improve communication and reduce misunderstandings. For example, a person with a serialist cognitive style may prefer detailed, step-by-step explanations, while a person with a holistic cognitive style may prefer an overview of the situation.

Two people engaged in a serious discussion.

Criticisms and Controversies

Despite its potential benefits, the concept of cognitive style has been subject to criticism. Some researchers argue that cognitive style is too vague a concept to be useful, while others argue that it is simply a reflection of personality traits or cognitive abilities, rather than a distinct construct.

Conclusion

While the concept of cognitive style has been subject to debate, it remains a useful tool for understanding individual differences in cognition. By understanding an individual's cognitive style, we can tailor our communication, teaching methods, and problem-solving strategies to better match their preferred way of thinking.