View source for Tariff of 1828

== Background and Context ==

The [[Tariff of 1828]], often referred to as the "Tariff of Abominations," was a significant legislative act in the history of the United States. Enacted on May 19, 1828, this tariff was designed to protect industry in the northern United States by imposing high duties on imported goods. The tariff was part of a broader economic strategy known as the [[American System]], which aimed to strengthen the national economy through protective tariffs, a national bank, and internal improvements.

The tariff was a response to the economic challenges faced by American manufacturers in the early 19th century. During this period, the United States was transitioning from an agrarian economy to an industrial one. The northern states, in particular, were developing manufacturing industries that required protection from foreign competition, primarily from British manufacturers who could produce goods more cheaply due to their advanced industrial capabilities.

== Legislative Process and Political Dynamics ==

The passage of the Tariff of 1828 was marked by intense political maneuvering and sectional tensions. The tariff was introduced by [[Martin Van Buren]] and other members of the Democratic-Republican Party, who sought to gain political support from northern industrialists and workers. However, the tariff was also designed to be politically divisive, with provisions that would alienate southern states, which relied heavily on imported goods and were opposed to high tariffs.

The tariff's passage through Congress involved complex negotiations and compromises. It was supported by northern states, where the industrial base was growing, but faced strong opposition from southern states, which viewed the tariff as economically harmful and unconstitutional. The southern states argued that the tariff disproportionately benefited the North at the expense of the South, which relied on exporting agricultural products and importing manufactured goods.

<div class='only_on_desktop image-preview'><div class='image-preview-loader'></div></div><div class='only_on_mobile image-preview'><div class='image-preview-loader'></div></div>

== Economic Implications ==

The Tariff of 1828 had significant economic implications for the United States. It raised duties on a wide range of imported goods, including textiles, iron, and other manufactured products. The average tariff rate increased to about 45%, making it one of the highest tariffs in U.S. history. This increase was intended to protect American industries from foreign competition by making imported goods more expensive.

For northern manufacturers, the tariff provided a competitive advantage by reducing the influx of cheaper foreign goods. This protection allowed domestic industries to grow and expand, contributing to the industrialization of the northern states. However, the tariff also led to higher prices for consumers, as the cost of imported goods increased.

In the southern states, the economic impact was largely negative. Southern planters, who relied on exporting cotton and other agricultural products, faced retaliatory tariffs from foreign countries, particularly Great Britain. These retaliatory measures reduced the demand for American agricultural exports, leading to economic hardship in the South.

== Sectional Tensions and Political Repercussions ==

The Tariff of 1828 exacerbated sectional tensions between the North and the South. Southern states, particularly [[South Carolina]], were vehemently opposed to the tariff and viewed it as an overreach of federal power. The tariff became a focal point of southern discontent, contributing to the growing divide between the two regions.

In response to the tariff, South Carolina adopted the [[Doctrine of Nullification]], which argued that states had the right to nullify federal laws deemed unconstitutional. This doctrine was championed by [[John C. Calhoun]], a prominent southern politician and Vice President of the United States at the time. Calhoun's advocacy for nullification set the stage for a constitutional crisis and foreshadowed the secessionist sentiments that would later lead to the [[American Civil War]].

The political repercussions of the Tariff of 1828 were significant. It contributed to the realignment of political parties, with the emergence of the [[Democratic Party]] and the [[Whig Party]]. The tariff also played a role in the election of [[Andrew Jackson]] as President in 1828, as he positioned himself as a champion of the common man and a critic of the tariff's negative impact on the South.

== Long-term Effects and Legacy ==

The Tariff of 1828 had lasting effects on American politics and economics. It highlighted the deepening sectional divide between the North and the South, a divide that would continue to grow in the decades leading up to the Civil War. The tariff also underscored the challenges of balancing regional interests within a federal system of government.

In the long term, the tariff contributed to the development of American industry by providing protection for domestic manufacturers. However, it also set a precedent for future tariff debates and conflicts over trade policy. The tensions and controversies surrounding the Tariff of 1828 would resurface in subsequent tariff legislation, including the [[Tariff of 1832]] and the [[Compromise Tariff of 1833]].

The legacy of the Tariff of 1828 is reflected in its role as a catalyst for political and economic change. It demonstrated the complexities of crafting trade policy in a diverse and rapidly changing nation and highlighted the need for compromise and negotiation in addressing regional differences.

== See Also ==

* [[American System (economic plan)]]
* [[Doctrine of Nullification]]
* [[Compromise Tariff of 1833]]

[[Category:United States economic history]]
[[Category:Tariffs]]
[[Category:1828 in the United States]]